In Indonesia, Lasem identities as a China Town are constructed and developed over time, and Chinese architectural heritage is one of the main qualities and identity of the city. Recently, these unique Chinese architectural heritages have been transformed for tourism needs. This paper aims to document the transformation of functions or adaptive reuse, and its impact on forms and meanings of the Chinese architectural heritage of the city, and focuses on whether the interventions that occurred were by the principles of architectural conservation. In April 2019, the study surveyed and documented five Chinese historic buildings in Karangturi area in Lasem to understand how the architectural heritage has transformed. The result shows that tourism has a direct influence on changes in the building functions in Lasem, such as the Oei House and Little China that have changed from residences to homestays to accommodate the needs of tourists' lodgings. The other two buildings, namely House of Nyah Giok and Nyah Lasem museum have also changed their functions from residences to a batik home industry and a museum related to tourism attractions. Interventions on the four buildings with sensitive uses are following the principle of minimum intervention that preserved the original main buildings and changed only in the wings buildings, and new buildings for lodgings were infilled in vacant land of the site for the Oei House case. For one building, however, tourism has no direct influence on changes in the building functions, it has changed from a residence to an Islamic boarding school for the development of Islamic education that had nothing to do with preserving Chinese culture. Indirectly, the building remains a tourist destination because of its unique Chinese architectural features. Findings show that for the four Chinese owners, the meaning or significance for the adaptation of the building is preserving historic values of the Chinese architecture, and economic values as well by developing commercial spaces and historic areas for tourist attractions.
Full text article
Aini, S., Antariksa & Turningtyas (2016). Pelestarian lingkungan dan bangunan kuno di kawasan Pecinan kota Lasem. [Master’s thesis, Universitas Brawijaya]. Universitas Brawijaya Repository. http://repository.ub.ac.id/157210/
Australia ICOMOS. (n.d.). The Burra Charter: the Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Significance 2013. Retrieved October 27, 2019, from http://www.australia. icomos.org.
English Heritage (2008). The Conservation Principles, Policies and Guidance for the Sustainable Management of the Historic Environment. Retrieved November 12, 2019, from http://www.historicengland.org.uk
Feilden, B. M. (2003). Conservation of Historic Buildings. Architectural Press.
Guo, Qing-hua (2002). Visual dictionary of Chinese Architecture. Images Publishing.
ICOMOS. (n.d.). International Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites (The Venice Charter 1964). Retrieved April 17, 2019, from http://www. international.icomos.org/e_venice.htm.
Jones, R. (2009). Chinese loan-words in Malay and Indonesian: A background study. University of Malaysia.
Knapp, R. G. ed. (1992). Chinese landscape: The village as place. University of Hawaii Press.
Kustedja, S., Sudikno, A. & Salura, P. (2012). Feng-shui: Elemen budaya Tionghoa Tradisional. Melintas-International Journal of Philoshophy and Religion 28(1), 61-89. https://doi.org/10.26593/mel.v28i1.289.61-89.
Kwanda, T. (2004). Desain Bangunan Baru Pada Kawasan Pelestarian di Surabaya. Dimensi Teknik Arsitektur 32(2), 102-109. https://doi.org/10.9744/dimensi.32.2.
Kwanda, T. (2013). Mengelola Perubahan: Perencanaan Konservasi Gedung De Javasche Bank Surabaya. Dimensi (Journal of Architecture and Built Environment), 40(1), 39-52. https://doi.org/10.9744/dimensi.40.1.39-52.
Kwanda, T. (2015). Authenticity principle in Conservation of De Javasche Bank of Surabaya: Materials, substance and form. Procedia Engineering 125, 675 – 684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.104.
Lim, H. & Mead, D. (2011). Chinese in Indonesia: A background study. SIL International. https://www.sil.org/system/files/reapdata/42/18/ 93/42189372626348570380267654218017959519/silesr2011_028.pdf.
Orbasli, A. (2008). Architectural conservation: Principle and Practice. Blackwell Science.
Rozov, D. (2013). Carlile house: Finding ways to preserve run-down heritage buildings through their adaptive reuse [Master’s thesis, Unitec Institute of Technology]. Unitec Institute of Technology Reseach Bank Record. https://hdl.handle.net/10652/2467.
Von Meiss, P. (1990). Elements of Architecture: From form to place. Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Wang, Yuwei (2012). Persistence of the collective urban model in Beijing. http://projectivecities. aaschool.ac.uk/portfolio/yuwei-wang-beijing-collective/
Yıldırım, M. & Turan, G. (2012). Sustainable development in historic areas: adaptive reuse challenges in traditional houses in Sanliurfa, Turkey. Habitat International 36, 493-503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2012.05.005.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution: other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
With the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher's final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher's request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author's own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- The Work is the Author's original work;
- The Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- The Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- The Work has not previously been published;
- The Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- The Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author's breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 7 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher's use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.