Planning Proximity: A Critical Perspective on Measuring the 15-Minute City
Abstract
Although the 15-minute city has become a prominent paradigm in contemporary urban planning, the conditions under which urban proximity can be meaningfully measured and operationalized remain insufficiently defined. While it has gained widespread recognition through its strong political and scientific appeal, it remains characterized by methodological and operational ambiguities, reflecting a persistent gap between its rhetorical appeal and its practical implementation in urban planning. Despite the growing number of proximity assessment approaches, no shared conceptual framework currently exists to organize the diversity of existing methodologies. Existing assessment approaches—predominantly grounded in GIS-based and quantitative methods—struggle to capture the multidimensional nature of urban proximity.
This article presents a critical comparative review of 47 proximity assessment methodologies covering the period 2016–2025. Rather than conducting a systematic review, the study adopts a critical analytical approach to examine how urban proximity has been conceptualized, measured, and operationalized across different disciplinary traditions and urban contexts. Three principal findings emerge from the comparative analysis: the disciplinary compartmentalization of proximity assessment, largely dominated by engineering and GIS-based approaches; the absence of a shared conceptual framework despite the plurality of "X-minute city" models and assessment methodologies; and the underrepresentation of polycentric medium-sized cities, despite their strategic role within the European urban system. Building upon these findings, the article proposes the Integrated Proximity Matrix as a conceptual synthesis rather than as a new measurement indicator. The matrix integrates the complementary methodological dimensions identified across the reviewed literature into a coherent conceptual architecture intended to support the future development of context-sensitive proximity assessment methodologies. Developed within the broader context of an ongoing doctoral research project conducted in Prato (Italy), this framework constitutes the conceptual bridge between the comparative findings presented here and their future empirical implementation and validation in urban planning practice.
Full text article
References
Allam, Z., Bibri, S. E., Chabaud, D., & Moreno, C. (2022a). The Theoretical, Practical, and Technological Foundations of the 15-Minute City Model: Proximity and Its Environmental, Social and Economic Benefits for Sustainability. Energies, 15(16), Article 6042. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15166042
Allam, Z., Khavarian-Garmsir, A. R., Lassaube, U., Chabaud, D., & Moreno, C. (2024). Mapping the Implementation Practices of the 15-Minute City. Smart Cities, 7(4), 2094–2109. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities7040083
Allam, Z., Moreno, C., Chabaud, D., & Pratlong, F. (2022b). Proximity-Based Planning and the “15-Minute City”: A Sustainable Model for the City of the Future. In The Palgrave Handbook of Global Sustainability (pp. 1–20). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38948-2_178-1
Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320887
Büttner, B., Seisenberger, S., McCormick, B., Silva, C., Teixeira, J. F., & Papa, E. (2024a). Mapping of 15-minute City Practices: Overview on strategies, policies and implementation in Europe and beyond. [Preprint]. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.12661.79842
Büttner, B., Silva, C., Merlin, L., & Geurs, K. (2024b). Just around the corner: Accessibility by proximity in the 15-minute city. Journal of Urban Mobility, 6, Article 100095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urbmob.2024.100095
Capasso Da Silva, D., King, D. A., & Lemar, S. (2020). Accessibility in practice: 20-minute city as a sustainability planning goal. Sustainability, 12(1), 129. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010129
Caprotti, F., Duarte, C., & Joss, S. (2024). The 15-minute city as paranoid urbanism: Ten critical reflections. Cities, 155, Article 105497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105497
Caselli, B., Carra, M., Rossetti, S., & Zazzi, M. (2022). Exploring the 15-minute neighbourhoods: An evaluation based on the walkability performance to public facilities. Transportation Research Procedia, 60, 346–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2021.12.045
City of Portland Bureau of Planning and Sustainability. (2012). The Portland Plan. City of Portland. https://www.portland.gov/bps/planning/about-bps/portland-plan [tracking parameter removed]
Del Fiore, M., & Servillo, L. (2023). Small and medium-sized towns and cities in Italy (ESPON Working Paper). ESPON.
D'Onofrio, R., & Trusiani, E. (2022). The Future of the City in the Name of Proximity: A New Perspective for the Urban Regeneration of Council Housing Suburbs in Italy after the Pandemic. Sustainability, 14(3), Article 1252. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031252
Elldér, E. (2024). The 15-minute city dilemma? Balancing local accessibility and gentrification in Gothenburg, Sweden. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 135, Article 104360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2024.104360
European Commission, Eurostat. (2016). Urban Europe: Statistics on cities, towns and suburbs (2016 ed.). Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2785/91120
Ferrer-Ortiz, C., Marquet, O., Mojica, L., & Vich, G. (2022). Barcelona under the 15-Minute City Lens: Mapping the Accessibility and Proximity Potential Based on Pedestrian Travel Times. Smart Cities, 5(1), 146-161. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities5010010
Gaglione, F. (2021). 15-minute neighbourhood accessibility: A comparison between Naples and London. European Transport - Trasporti Europei, (85), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.48295/ET.2021.85.5
Gaglione, F., & Calafiore, A. (2024). Sustainable Mobility and the X-Minute City: The Case Study of Berlin and Tehran. In M. Tira, M. Tiboni, M. Pezzagno, & G. Maternini (Eds.), New Challenges for Sustainable Urban Mobility: Volume I (pp. 159–169). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-62248-9_14
Glover, T. D. (2025). Conspiracy Thinking About the 15-Minute City: Something from Nothing? Leisure Sciences, 47(3), 443–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2024.2387703
Gower, A., & Grodach, C. (2022). Planning Innovation or City Branding? Exploring How Cities Operationalise the 20-Minute Neighbourhood Concept. Urban Policy and Research, 40(1), 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2021.2019701
Khavarian-Garmsir, A. R., Sharifi, A., Hajian Hossein Abadi, M., & Moradi, Z. (2023). From Garden City to 15-Minute City: A Historical Perspective and Critical Assessment. Land, 12(2), Article 512. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020512
Knap, E., Ulak, M. B., Geurs, K. T., Mulders, A., & van der Drift, S. (2023). A composite X-minute city cycling accessibility metric and its role in assessing spatial and socioeconomic inequalities – A case study in Utrecht, the Netherlands. Journal of Urban Mobility, 3, Article 100043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urbmob.2022.100043
Lanza, G., Pucci, P., & Carboni, L. (2023). Measuring accessibility by proximity for an inclusive city. Cities, 143, Article 104581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104581
Lefebvre, H., Hess, R., Deulceux, S., & Weigand, G. (2009). Le droit à la ville (3e éd.). Economica-Anthropos.
Logan, T. M., Hobbs, M. H., Conrow, L. C., Reid, N. L., Young, R. A., & Anderson, M. J. (2022). The x-minute city: Measuring the 10, 15, 20-minute city and an evaluation of its use for sustainable urban design. Cities, 131, Article 103924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103924
López García de Leániz, C., & Fernández Lobo, A. (2023). 15-Minute city: Utopia or reality? Transportation Research Procedia, 71, 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2023.11.076
Lu, M., & Diab, E. (2023). Understanding the determinants of x-minute city policies: A review of the North American and Australian cities' planning documents. Journal of Urban Mobility, 3, Article 100040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urbmob.2022.100040
Marquet, O., Anguelovski, I., Nello-Deakin, S., & Honey-Rosés, J. (2025). Decoding the 15-Minute City Debate: Conspiracies, Backlash, and Dissent in Planning for Proximity. Journal of the American Planning Association, 91(1), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2024.2346596
Master SIGAT, & Chaire ETI. (2021). Repenser la ville du quart d'heure par les données et la géovisualisation: Documentation—Rapport méthodologique [Rethinking the 15-minute city through data and geovisualization: Documentation—Methodological report]. Master SIGAT; Chaire ETI. https://chaire-eti.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Rapport-methodologique.pdf
Master SIGAT, & Chaire ETI. (n.d.). Cartographie de la matrice HQVS à Toulouse [Interactive web map]. Université Rennes 2. https://sites-formations.univ-rennes2.fr/mastersigat/WebMaps/Chaire_ETI/matriceHQVS/carte/index.html
Megahed, G., Elshater, A., Afifi, S., & Elrefaie, M. A. (2024). Reconceptualizing Proximity Measurement Approaches through the Urban Discourse on the X-Minute City. Sustainability, 16(3), Article 1303. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031303
Moreno, C., Allam, Z., Chabaud, D., Gall, C., & Pratlong, F. (2021). Introducing the “15-Minute City”: Sustainability, Resilience and Place Identity in Future Post-Pandemic Cities. Smart Cities, 4(1), 93–111. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities4010006
Morin, E. (1992). Introduction à la pensée complexe (Introduction to Complex Thought) (4th printing). ESF éd.
Mott MacDonald, & Leeds City Council. (2022). Leeds 20-minute neighbourhoods technical note. Leeds City Council. https://www.leeds.gov.uk/docs/Local%20Plan%20Update/Local%20Plan%20Update%20-%2020%20Minute%20Neighbourhoods%20Report.pdf
Mouratidis, K. (2024). Time to challenge the 15-minute city: Seven pitfalls for sustainability, equity, livability, and spatial analysis. Cities, 153, Article 105274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105274
OECD. (2018). Urban population by city size. https://www.oecd.org/en/data/indicators/urban-population-by-city-size.html
Olivari, B., Cipriano, P., Napolitano, M., & Giovannini, L. (2023). Are Italian cities already 15-minute? Presenting the Next Proximity Index: A novel and scalable way to measure it, based on open data. Journal of Urban Mobility, 4, Article 100057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urbmob.2023.100057
Pozoukidou, G., & Chatziyiannaki, Z. (2021). 15-Minute City: Decomposing the New Urban Planning Eutopia. Sustainability, 13(2), Article 928. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020928
Servillo, L., Atkinson, R., & Hamdouch, A. (2017). Small and Medium‐Sized Towns in Europe: Conceptual, Methodological and Policy Issues. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 108(4), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12252
Sharifi, A. (2016). From Garden City to Eco-urbanism: The quest for sustainable neighborhood development. Sustainable Cities and Society, 20, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2015.09.002
Silva, C., Büttner, B., Seisenberger, S., & Rauli, A. (2023). Proximity-centred accessibility—A conceptual debate involving experts and planning practitioners. Journal of Urban Mobility, 4, Article 100060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urbmob.2023.100060
Sony Computer Science Laboratories Rome. (n.d.). 15min-City: Interactive accessibility map [Interactive web map]. WhatIf Machine. http://whatif.sonycsl.it/15mincity/map_bike.html
Staricco, L. (2022). 15-, 10- or 5-minute city? A focus on accessibility to services in Turin, Italy. Journal of Urban Mobility, 2, Article 100030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urbmob.2022.100030
Teixeira, J. F., Silva, C., Seisenberger, S., Büttner, B., McCormick, B., Papa, E., & Cao, M. (2024). Classifying 15-minute Cities: A review of worldwide practices. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 189, Article 104234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2024.104234
Willberg, E., Fink, C., & Toivonen, T. (2023). The 15-minute city for all? – Measuring individual and temporal variations in walking accessibility. Journal of Transport Geography, 106, Article 103521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103521
Zhang, D., Ma, S., Fan, J., Xie, D., Jiang, H., & Wang, G. (2023a). Assessing spatial equity in urban park accessibility: An improved two-step floating catchment area method from the perspective of the 15-minute city concept. Sustainable Cities and Society, 98, Article 104824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104824
Zhang, S., Wu, W., Xiao, Z., Wu, S., Zhao, Q., Ding, D., & Wang, L. (2023b). Creating livable cities for healthy ageing: Cognitive health in older adults and their 15-minute walkable neighbourhoods. Cities, 137, Article 104312. https://doi.org/10.101
Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution: other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
With the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher's final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher's request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author's own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- The Work is the Author's original work;
- The Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- The Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- The Work has not previously been published;
- The Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- The Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author's breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 7 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher's use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Article Details
Accepted 2026-07-16
Published 2026-07-31