Brownfield Land Redevelopment Strategies in Urban Areas : Criteria Contributing to the Decision-making Process
Abstract
Urban intensification seems to be a growing trend, especially in the context of severe land scarcity. Brownfields offer great potential in meeting the increasing demand for housing in major cities worldwide. Redevelopment projects appear to provide immediate solutions to housing shortages that are being experienced due to population pressures in large metropolitan areas. The paper explores the range of factors that property developers need to consider in their decision-making process when assessing the viability of brownfield redevelopments. This research, which employed a comparative case study approach, and examined two brownfield redevelopments in Auckland, focused on the economic, social, and environmental criteria that were utilised in the decision-making process. Document analysis of the two case studies, site observations, and semi-structured interviews with the property developers were the main data collection methods. The results suggested that the economic aspects of a brownfield redevelopment are the most important criteria that developers consider during the feasibility assessment of proposed projects. Projects that offer the potential for quick investment returns for all stakeholders are the preferred choice for developers. Brownfield redevelopments offer significant potential for invigorating local areas through urban intensification which boosts local businesses and encourages community revitalisation. The environmental concerns appear to be the lowest priority and little consideration is given to reducing the environmental impacts or incorporating green building practices in the new developments. A major shift from a purely economic focus toward a comprehensive environmental approach to new developments is needed to ensure the sustainable development of cities.
Full text article
References
Adair, A., Berry, J., McGreal, S., Hutchison, N., Watkins, C., & Gibb, K. (2003). Urban regeneration and property investment performance. Journal of Property Research, 20(4), 371-386. https://doi.org/10.1080/0959991042000181994
Adelaja, S., Shaw, J., Beyea, W., & McKeown, J. C. (2010). Renewable energy potential on brownfield sites: A case study of Michigan. Energy Policy, 38(11), 7021-7030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.07.021
Auckland Council (2016). Auckland Unitary Plan. https://unitaryplan.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/pages/plan/Book.aspx?exhibit=AucklandUnitaryPlan_Print
Auckland Council (2018). Auckland Design Manual. Unitary Plan 101: Your Easy Guide to understanding the Residential Standards. https://content.aucklanddesignmanual.co.nz/Regulations/Documents/UNITARY%20PLAN_101.pdf
Bacot, H., & O’Dell, C. (2006). Establishing indicators to evaluate brownfield redevelopment. Economic Development Quarterly, 20(2), 142-161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242405285749
Barlindhaug, R. & Nordahl, B.I. (2018). Developers’ price setting behaviour in urban residential redevelopment projects. Journal of European Real Estate Research, 11(1), 71-86. https://doi.org/10.1108/JERER-03-2017-0014
Bayleys (2018). 111 Russell Road, Manurewa. https://www.bayleys.co.nz/1850933
Beames, A., Broekx, S., Schneidewind, U., Landuyt, D., van der Meulen, M., Heijungs, R., & Seuntjens, P. (2018). Amenity proximity analysis for sustainable brownfield redevelopment planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 171, 68-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.12.003
Bieback, K. (2002). Housing development on brownfield sites. Environmental Law Review, 4(4), 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/146145290200400403
Boudjadja, R., & Boudemagh, S. S. (2021). Environmental assessment of a brownfield regeneration project using integrated sustainable development indicator system (Isdis). International Journal on Technical and Physical Problems of Engineering (IJTPE), 13(47), 27-34.
Brown, N., Burkes, F., & Faust, M. (2016). Benefits of brownfield redevelopment in Minnesota. Minnesota Brownfields. https://dehs.umn.edu/sites/dehs.umn.edu/files/benefits_of_brownfield_redevelopment_july2016.pdf
Brun, M., Di Pietro, F., & Bonthoux, S. (2018). Residents’ perceptions and valuations of urban wastelands are influenced by vegetation structure. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 29, 393-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.01.005
Campbell, S. (2010). Comparative case study. In A.J. Mills, G. Durepos, & E. Wiebe (Eds.). Encyclopaedia of case study research (pp. 174-175). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Cappai, F., Forgues, D., & Glaus, M. (2019). A methodological approach for evaluating brownfield redevelopment projects. Urban Science, 3(2), 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci3020045
DDL Homes. (2022). Neodomo Ellerslie. https://www.ddlhomes.co.nz/projects/selling/neodomo-ellerslie/
De Sousa, C. (2000). Brownfield redevelopment versus greenfield development: A private sector perspective on the costs and risks associated with brownfield redevelopment in the Greater Toronto Area. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 43(6), 831-853. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560020001719
Denscombe, M. (2010). Good Research Guide: For small-scale social research projects, McGraw¬ Hill Education.
Dulić, O., & Krklješ, M. (2014). Brownfield redevelopment as a strategy for preventing urban sprawl. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281651820_Brownfield_Redevelopment_as_a_Strategy_for_Preventing_Urban_Sprawl
Edmunds, S. (2021, Sept 30). Consents for houses hit record high. Stuff. https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/300419665/consents-for-houses-hit-record-high#:~:text=In%20Auckland%2C%20there%20were%2012%2C972,the%20year%20ended%20August%202021.&text=There%20were%20consents%20issued%20for,cent%20rise%20in%20July%202021.
EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency (2020). Brownfields program environmental and economic benefits. EPA. https://www.epa.gov/brownfields/brownfields-program-environmental-and-economic-benefits
EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency (2021). Overview of EPA's brownfields program. EPA. https://www.epa.gov/brownfields/overview-epas-brownfields-program
Euronews (2021, September 21). Could housing shortages in Berlin and nationwide sway German voter choice? Euronews. https://www.euronews.com/2021/09/21/could-housing-shortages-in-berlin-and-nationwide-sway-german-voter-choice
Freeman, P., Hembrow, I., Warwick, E., White, A., (2020). How to solve the housing crisis. Saïd Business School, University of Oxford. eppdscrmssa01.blob.core.windows.net
Greenaway-McGrevy, R., & Sorensen, K. (2017). How will we know if the Auckland Unitary Plan is working? Accounting for the redevelopment premium in house price measurement. Centre for Applied Research in Economics Working Paper, 1. https://cdn.auckland.ac.nz/assets/business/about/our-research/research-institutes-and-centres/CARE/Redevelopment-and-House-Prices.pdf
Guironnet, A., Attuyer, K., & Halbert, L. (2016). Building cities on financial assets: The financialisation of property markets and its implications for city governments in the Paris city-region. Urban Studies, 53(7), 1442-1464. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015576474
Haninger, K., Ma, L., & Timmins, C. (2017). The value of brownfield remediation. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 4 (1), 197-241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/689743
Hellawell, E. E., & Hughes, S. J. (2021). Asbestos contamination on brownfield development sites in the UK. Environmental Research, 198, 110480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110480
Hewett, W. (2021, November 11). New Zealand's housing shortfall will be met in around 12 months' time, major bank predicts. Newshub. https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/new-zealand/2021/11/new-zealand-s-housing-shortfall-will-be-met-in-around-12-months-time-major-bank-predicts.html
Kim, G. (2018). An integrated system of urban green infrastructure on different types of vacant land to provide multiple benefits for local communities. Sustainable cities and society, 36, 116-130.
Kim, G., Miller, P. A., & Nowak, D. J. (2018). Urban vacant land typology: A tool for managing urban vacant land. Sustainable Cities and Society, 36, 144-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.09.014
Kotval-K, Z. (2016). Brownfield redevelopment: Why public investments can pay off. Economic Development Quarterly, 30(3), 275-282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242416656049
Kronenberg, J. (2015). Why not to green a city? Institutional barriers to preserving urban ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 12, 218-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.002
Longo, A., Campbell, D. (2017). The determinants of brownfields redevelopment in England. Environmental and Resource Economics, 67(2), 261–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-015-9985-y
Loures, L. (2015). Post-industrial landscapes as drivers for urban redevelopment: Public versus expert perspectives towards the benefits and barriers of the reuse of post-industrial sites in urban areas. Habitat International, 45, 72-81.
Maharaj, S. & Martin, S. (2021). The gravity of Auckland's density. Auckland Council. https://www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/about-auckland-council/business-in-auckland/docsoccasionalpapers/insights-paper-zoning-april-2021.pdf
Marquesini, G. (2018, December 5). Affordable housing for the 21st century. RICS. https://www.rics.org/oceania/news-insight/latest-news/rics-150th-anniversary/pride-in-the-profession/gonzalo-marquesini-mrics-affordable-housing/
Martin, S. & Norman, D. (2018). The brownfield bounce. Auckland Council. https://www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/about-auckland-council/business-in-auckland/docsoccasionalpapers/the-brownfield-bounce-march-2018.pdf
Martinát, S., Dvorak, P., Frantal, B., Klusacek, P., Kunc, J. & Navratil, J., Osman, R., Tureckova, K. & Reed, M. (2016). Sustainable urban development in a city affected by heavy industry and mining? Case study of brownfields in Karvina, Czech Republic. Journal of Cleaner Production, 118(1), pp. 78-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.029
Nienaber, M., & Johnson, S. (2021, May 10). Pandemic surge in European house prices raises fears of new bubble. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/pandemic-surge-european-house-prices-raises-fears-new-bubble-2021-05-10/
O'Reilly, M., & Brink, R. (2006). Initial risk-based screening of potential brownfield development sites. Soil and Sediment Contamination: An International Journal, 15(5), 463–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/15320380600846916
Otsuka, N., Dixon, T., & Abe, H. (2013). Stock measurement and regeneration policy approaches to ‘hardcore’ brownfield sites: England and Japan compared. Land Use Policy, 33, 36-41.
Pahlen, G., & Glöckner, S. (2004). Sustainable regeneration of European brownfield sites. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 70, 221-232.
Perovic, S., & Kurtović Folić, N. (2012). Brownfield regeneration–imperative for sustainable urban development. Građevinar, 64(05.), 373-383.
Property Value (2022). https://www.propertyvalue.co.nz/auckland/auckland/ellerslie-1051/42-arthur-street-ellerslie-auckland-1051-8781698
Rey E., Laprise M., Lufkin S. (2021). The multiple potentials of urban brownfields. In: Neighbourhoods in Transition. The Urban Book Series. (pp. 47-63) Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82208-8_3
Squires, G., & Hutchison, N. (2021). Barriers to affordable housing on brownfield sites. Land Use Policy, 102, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105276
Statista (2022). Number of building consents granted for new apartments in Auckland, New Zealand from 2011 to 2021. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1036639/new-zealand-number-new-apartment-consents-auckland/
Stubbs, M. (2002). Car parking and residential development: Sustainability, design and planning policy, and public perceptions of parking provision. Journal of Urban Design, 7(2), 213-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357480022000012249
Syms, P. (1999). Redeveloping brownfield land: The decision‐making process. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 17(5), 481-500. https://doi.org/10.1108/14635789910294903
Tang, M. (2021, February 21). Mixed housing suburban vs mixed housing urban - What’s the difference? Planningplus. https://www.planningplus.co.nz/post/mixed-housing-suburban-vs-mixed-housing-urban-what-s-the-difference
Tema, J. (2020, March 27). Can brownfield development be the answer to the housing crisis? Inside Housing. https://www.insidehousing.co.uk/comment/comment/can-brownfield-development-be-the-answer-to-the-housing-crisis--65800
Thomas, M. R. (2003). Brownfield redevelopment: Information issues and the affected public. Environmental Practice, 5(1), 62-68. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1466046603030175
Thornton, G., Franz, M., Edwards, D., Pahlen, G., & Nathanail, P. (2007). The challenge of sustainability: Incentives for brownfield regeneration in Europe. Environmental Science & Policy, 10(2), 116-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2006.08.008
Umweltbundesamt (2005). Annual report 2005 – Federal Environmental Agency. Umwelt Bundesamt. https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/en/publikationen/annual-report-2005-federal-environmental-agency
Wang, L., Fang, L., & Hipel, K. W. (2011). Negotiation over costs and benefits in brownfield redevelopment. Group Decision and Negotiation, 20(4), 509-524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-009-9179-5
Wang, Z., Chen, X., Huang, N., Yang, Y., Wang, L., & Wang, Y. (2022). Spatial identification and redevelopment evaluation of brownfields in the perspective of urban complex ecosystems: A case of Wuhu City, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(1), 478. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010478
Włodarczyk-Marciniak, R., Sikorska, D., & Krauze, K. (2020). Residents’ awareness of the role of informal green spaces in a post-industrial city, with a focus on regulating services and urban adaptation potential. Sustainable Cities and Society, 59, 102236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102236
Wu, H., Tiwari, P., Han, S. S., & Chan, T. K. (2017). Brownfield risk communication and evaluation. Journal of Property Research, 34(3), 233-250. https://doi.org/10.1080/09599916.2017.1320684
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.
Zábranský, A. (2019). Prague housing crisis and possible solutions [PowerPoint slides]. https://www.fa.cvut.cz/fakulta/ustavy/15118-ustav-nauky-o-budovach/konference_ah2019/ah2019_zabransky_adam.pdf
Zapata-Diomedi, B., Boulangé, C., Giles-Corti, B., Phelan, K., Washington, S., Veerman, J. L., & Gunn, L. D. (2019). Physical activity-related health and economic benefits of building walkable neighbourhoods: A modelled comparison between brownfield and greenfield developments. International Journal of Behavioural Nutrition and Physical Activity, 16(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-019-0775-8
Zihannudin, N. Z., Maimun, N. H. A., & Ibrahim, N. L. (2021). Brownfield sites and property market sensitivity. Planning Malaysia: Journal of the Malaysian Institute of Planners, 19(2), 121-130. https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v19i16.957
Authors
Copyright (c) 2022 Mr, Dr, Dr
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution: other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
With the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher's final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher's request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author's own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- The Work is the Author's original work;
- The Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- The Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- The Work has not previously been published;
- The Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- The Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author's breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 7 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher's use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Article Details
Accepted 2022-12-29
Published 2022-12-30