Art, Biophilia, and Environmental Engagement: Promoting Community Resilience and Pro-Environmental Behaviors

Abstract

This article explores the relationship between art and emotional well-being through the project "Biophilia and Art: Jungles and Forests", a pictorial work made by Duván López. The research assesses how an art exhibition influences the levels of eco-anxiety and solastalgia, as well as the emotional resonance between the artist's creative state and the audience's experience. The proposal includes two modalities of participation: a virtual exhibition, which is accessed by 200 participants from all over the world (aged 14-74); and a face-to-face exhibition, in Catalonia, also with 200 participants (12-70 years old). The study measures the levels of echoanxiety and solastalgia before and after the visit (in both modalities) and evaluates changes in vocal prosody. In addition, initial and final photographs of the participants are incorporated for subsequent analysis with Artificial Intelligence, in order to record changes in facial expression and other non-verbal features. It is also planned to analyze the most repeated words and generate prosody maps that relate what is said (and what is omitted) with vocal and emotional patterns. Finally, participants are asked to make a drawing that represents their emotional and sensory experience. As well as choosing from 30 colored cards, which is the color that best represents your experience and why. The project seeks not only to improve the understanding of biophilia and its effect on emotional health, but also to promote a greater commitment to sustainability and the preservation of nature.


By combining these multimodal strategies, the project seeks not only to improve the understanding of biophilia and its effects on emotional health, but also to promote greater ecological empathy and commitment to sustainability. In doing so, it contributes directly to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being), by demonstrating how art can mitigate eco-anxiety and foster psychological resilience; SDG 4 (Quality Education), by integrating innovative and participatory methodologies into cultural and educational contexts; SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities), by supporting biophilic design as a strategy for healthier, more inclusive urban environments; and SDG 13 (Climate Action), by motivating participants to strengthen their connection with nature and engage in collective responses to environmental challenges. Beyond these contributions, the findings provide actionable insights for local and global socio-ecological policies, suggesting that biophilic art interventions can inform public health strategies, sustainability education, cultural programming, and climate adaptation efforts. In this sense, the findings suggest that biophilic art can act as a low-cost, scalable tool for environmental risk management and for strengthening collective resilience in the face of climate-related challenges.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Abbas, S., Okdeh, N., Roufayel, R., Kovacic, H., Sabatier, J.-M., Fajloun, Z., & Abi Khattar, Z. (2024). Neuroarchitecture: How the perception of our surroundings impacts the brain. Biology, 13(4), 220. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13040220

Adityo, A. (2024). The role of neuroscience and artificial intelligence in biophilic architectural design based on the principle of symbiosis. JARINA, 3(2), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.24002/jarina.v3i2.9119

Albrecht, G. (2006). Solastalgia. Alternatives Journal, 32(4–5), 34–36. https://researchportal.murdoch.edu.au/esploro/outputs/journalArticle/991005546025307891

Albrecht, G., Sartore, G. M., Connor, L., Higginbotham, N., Freeman, S., Kelly, B., Stain, H., Tonna, A., & Pollard, G. (2007). Solastalgia: The distress caused by environmental change. Australasian Psychiatry, 15(Suppl. 1), S95–S98. https://doi.org/10.1080/10398560701701288

Babin, B. J., Hoegg, J., & Gelinas-Chebat, C. (2023). Affective responses to digital art environments: Presence, empathy, and immersion. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 33(1), 44–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1337

Bourriaud, N. (2002). Relational aesthetics (S. Pleasance & F. Woods, Trans.). Les Presses du réel. (Original work published 1998). https://monoskop.org/Nicolas_Bourriaud

Brady, E. (2022). Aesthetic dimensions of ecological grief: Art, ethics, and loss. Environmental Values, 31(3), 281–301. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327122X16490873143394

Carlson, A. (2005). Aesthetics and the environment: The appreciation of nature, art, and architecture. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203981405

Chatterjee, A. (2014). The aesthetic brain: How we evolved to desire beauty and enjoy art. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199811809.001.0001

Chatterjee, A., & Cardillo, E. (2021). Brain, beauty, and art: Essays bringing neuroaesthetics into focus. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197513620.001.0001

Chatterjee, A., & Vartanian, O. (2014). Neuroaesthetics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(7), 370–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.03.003

Coburn, A., Vartanian, O., & Chatterjee, A. (2022). Neuroaesthetics of the built environment: A brief guide for architects and designers. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 7(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-021-00337-1

Hammoud, R., Tognin, S., Burgess, L., Bird, V., Giorgione, R., Russo, D., … McGuire, P. (2022). Smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment reveals mental health benefits of birdlife. Scientific Reports, 12, 17589. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20207-6

Jung, C. G. (1964). Man and his symbols (M.-L. von Franz, Ed.). Paidós. (Original work published 1964). https://archive.org/details/manhissymbols0000jung

Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/030621

Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2

Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822383574

Pinos, K. (2023). The synesthetic language of Picasso: Exploring emotions and sensations in his art. American Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Innovation, 3(4), 118–129. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajmri.v3i4.3236

Vella-Brodrick, D. A., & Gilowska, K. (2022). Effects of nature (greenspace) on cognitive functioning in school children and adolescents: A systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 34, 1217–1254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09658-5

Vessel, E. A., Isik, A. I., Belfi, A. M., Stahl, J. L., & Starr, G. G. (2022). Art reaches within: Aesthetic experience, the self, and the default mode network. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 16, 882110. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.882110

Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674045231

Xing, Y., Kar, P., Bird, J. J., Sumich, A., Knight, A., Lotfi, A., & Carpenter van Barthold, B. (2024a). Developing an AI-based digital biophilic art curation to enhance mental health in intelligent buildings. Sustainability, 16(22), 9790. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16229790

Xing, Y., Kar, P., Bird, J. J., Sumich, A., Knight, A., Lotfi, A., & Carpenter van Barthold, B. (2024b). Exploring machine learning applications for biophilic art displays to promote health and well-being. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Pervasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (PETRA ’24) (pp. 1–8). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3652037.3663897

Authors

Koncha Pinós
[email protected] (Primary Contact)
Pinós, K. (2025). Art, Biophilia, and Environmental Engagement: Promoting Community Resilience and Pro-Environmental Behaviors. Environmental Science & Sustainable Development, 10(3), 48–66. https://doi.org/10.21625/essd.v10i3.1209

Article Details

Received 2025-04-17
Accepted 2025-09-21
Published 2025-09-30