Impact of Biophilic Design on Supporting Metacognitive Thinking in Early Childhood in Childcare Centers A Multidisciplinary Study
Abstract
It is widely known how modern life from activities, games, and technologies has consumed children’s lives and attention, distracting them from the natural environment and its benefits. Moreover, although childcare centers are nowadays considered one of the primary environments where children spend most of their time, a child-nature connection is not much considered in their designs, giving more attention to technologies and artificial life. Environmental psychology theories declare that children are greatly affected by the surrounding physical environments, emphasizing nature as the richest environment that can feed their cognition and enhance their thinking skills, creativity, and development. A wealth of research studied the effect of nature-connected environments through biophilic design on children’s physical and psychological developmental aspects (226,975 articles since 2000). However, less concern is given to the cognitive development aspect (only 18.75% of the total), with a gap in terms of metacognition as a kind of high-order thinking. Metacognition enhances children's behavior and high-order thinking skills such as reflective thinking, creativity, and problem-solving. Hence, this paper aims to investigate the role of biophilic design in supporting metacognition in young children by conducting a multidisciplinary study that addresses the four theories Biophilic, Attention Restoration, Froebel’s theory, and Metacognition. The aim of this paper was achieved, firstly, by conducting a structured literature review in a multidisciplinary approach in Architectural, Environmental Psychology, Educational, and Cognitive Psychology fields using academic databases such as Elsevier, Scopus, Research Gate, and Academia. Secondly, analyzing the gathered data and the interrelations between the previously mentioned four selected theories. This paper’s findings show three conclusions; firstly, a restorative environment supports metacognition by stimulating reflective thinking and developing skills. Secondly, biophilic design’s attributes fulfill the factors for creating a restorative environment. Thirdly, specific metacognitive skills are supported by certain biophilic attributes. This paper revisits the design criteria for childcare centers providing a framework and a guideline abstracted from the biophilic approach for supporting children’s development and metacognition.
Full text article
References
Akturk, A. O., & Sahin, I. (2011). Literature review on metacognition and its measurement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3731–3736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.364 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.364
Brosterman, N. (1997). Inventing Kindergarten. http://www.amazon.com/Inventing-Kindergarten-Norman-Brosterman/dp/0810935260
Browning, W. D., Ryan, C. O., & Clancy, J. O. (2014). 14 Patterns of Biophilic Design.
Cherry, K. (2019). Cognitive Psychology : The Science of How We Think. 1–6.
Dadvand, P., Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J., Esnaola, M., Forns, J., Basagaña, X., Alvarez-Pedrerol, M., Rivas, I., López-Vicente, M., De Pascual, M. C., Su, J., Jerrett, M., Querol, X., & Sunyer, J. (2015). Green spaces and cognitive development in primary schoolchildren. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(26), 7937–7942. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1503402112 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1503402112
Denton, D. (2009). Reflection and learning: Characteristics, obstacles, and implications. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(8), 838–852. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2009.00600.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2009.00600.x
Farhanah Nik, Qamaruzaman, N., Fazli Ibrahim Bajunid, A., & Hassan, A. (2014). IMP_The Quality of Physical Environment in Workplace Childcare Centers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences.
Fisher, R. (1998). Thinking about thinking: Developing metacognition in children. Early Child Development and Care, 141(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/0300443981410101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0300443981410101
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.34.10.906 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.34.10.906
Gillis, K., & Gatersleben, B. (2015). A review of psychological literature on the health and wellbeing benefits of biophilic design. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings5030948 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings5030948
Han, K. T. (2003). A reliable and valid self-rating measure of the restorative quality of natural environments. Landscape and Urban Planning, 64(4), 209–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00241-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00241-4
Hulbig, P. (2020). Toward a Neurological Understanding of Metacognition.
Kahn, P. H. (1997). Developmental Psychology and the Biophilia Hypothesis: Children’s Affiliation with Nature. In DEVELOPMENTAL REVIEW (Vol. 17). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.1996.0430
Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2
Kellert, S. R. (2006). Building for life: Designing and understanding the human-nature connection. Renewable Resources Journal, 24(2).
Kellert, S. R., Heerwagen, J., & Mador, M. (2013). Biophilic Design : The Theory, Science and Practice of Bringing Buildings to Life.
Lee, H. C., & Park, S. J. (2018). Assessment of importance and characteristics of biophilic design patterns in a children’s library. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10040987 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10040987
Liu, X. (2020). Healthy designed environments for pre-school children: Investigating ways to optimize the restoration experience in nature-based outdoor play environments. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 81(12-A), No-Specified. http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=reference&D=psyc17&NEWS=N&AN=2020-51428-104
Magno, C. (2010). The role of metacognitive skills in developing critical thinking. Metacognition and Learning, 5(2), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-010-9054-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-010-9054-4
Meijer, J., Veenman, M. V. J., & van Hout-Wolters, B. (2012). Multi-domain, multi-method measures of metacognitive activity: What is all the fuss about metacognition... indeed? Research Papers in Education, 27(5), 597–627. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2010.550011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2010.550011
Moore, T. H. M., Kesten, J. M., López-López, J. A., Ijaz, S., McAleenan, A., Richards, A., Gray, S., Savović, J., & Audrey, S. (2018). The effects of changes to the built environment on the mental health and well-being of adults: Systematic review. Health and Place, 53(June), 237–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.07.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.07.012
Nazarieh, M. (2016). A Brief History of Metacognition and Principles of Metacognitive Instruction in Learning. Best: Journal of Humanities, Arts, Medicine and Sciences, 2(2), 61–64. www.bestjournals.in
Park, S. J., & Lee, H. C. (2019). Spatial Design of Childcare Facilities Based on Biophilic Design Patterns. Sustainability, 11(10), 2851. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102851 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102851
Robson, S. (2010). Self-regulation and metacognition in young children’s self-initiated play and reflective dialogue. International Journal of Early Years Education, 18(3), 227–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2010.521298 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2010.521298
Schertz, K. E., & Berman, M. G. (2019). Understanding Nature and Its Cognitive Benefits. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(5), 496–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419854100 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419854100
Schutte, A. R., Torquati, J. C., & Beattie, H. L. (2015). Impact of Urban Nature on Executive Functioning in Early and Middle Childhood. Environment and Behavior, 49(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916515603095 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916515603095
Spalding, A. (2020). How to encourage reflective teaching in your school. Iris, 1–14. https://blog.irisconnect.com/uk/blog/5-benefits-of-encouraging-teacher-self-reflection
Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. In Metacognition and Learning (Vol. 1, Issue 1, pp. 3–14). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0
Wells, N. M. (2000a). At home with nature: Effects of “greenness” on children’s cognitive functioning. Environment and Behavior, 32(6), 775–795. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160021972793
Wells, N. M. (2000b). Effects of “ Greenness ” on Children’s Cognitive. Environment and Behavior, 32(6), 775–795. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160021972793
Authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution: other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
With the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher's final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher's request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author's own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- The Work is the Author's original work;
- The Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- The Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- The Work has not previously been published;
- The Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- The Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author's breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 7 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher's use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
