Soil Microbial Fuel Cell with Hydrophilic Treated Buckypaper Anodes

Abstract

Fossil fuels, the primary source of energy supply in modern society, are both unsustainable and damaging to the environment. The most cost-effective way to reduce the use of fossil fuels is to switch to renewable energy sources. Soil microbial fuel cells (SMFC) are a green energy production method because they use electron-generating bacteria in the soil to obtain electrical energy from organic matter. One way to improve the output of SMFCs is to increase the specific surface area of the anodes. The larger specific surface area allows more electrons to be received from the bacteria. In this study, bucky paper (BP) was utilized as the anode of SMFC. BP is a freestanding film fabricated from multi-walled carbon nanotubes (CNT) by vacuum filtration method. CNT has a high specific surface area and electrical conductivity. BP is also considered to be mechanically stable in soil due to its CNT network structure. However, the surface of the BP is hydrophobic. In SMFCs, the hydrophobic surface of the anode is a fatal disadvantage in terms of the affinity of microorganisms. Thus, heat treatment and UV ozone treatment were employed to make the surface of BP hydrophilic, and their output in SMFCs was investigated. As a result, SMFCs using UV-ozone-treated BPs as anodes produced the highest power density of 28.8 μW/cm². Also, unlike thermal treatment, UV ozone treatment did not damage the CNT structure. Hence, in this experiment, the output power of the SMFC was stable for at least 140 hours.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Olabi, A. G., & Abdelkareem, M. A. (2022). Renewable energy and climate change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 158, Article 112111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112111.

Rahman, A., Farrok, O., & Haque, M. M. (2022). Environmental impact of renewable energy source based electrical power plants: Solar, wind, hydroelectric, biomass, geothermal, tidal, ocean, and osmotic. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 161, Article 112279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112279.

Li, C., Omine, K., Sivasankar, V., Sano, H., & Chicas, S. D. (2021). Development of low-cost solid phase microbial fuel cell using organic waste and recycling of materials after power generation: Characterization of carbon anode. Biomass and Bioenergy, 154, Article 106266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2021.106266.

Yamashita, T., Hayashi, T., Iwasaki, H., Awatsu, M., & Yokoyama, H. Ultra-low-power energy harvester for microbial fuel cells and its application to environmental sensing and long-range wireless data transmission. Journal of Power Sources, 430, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.04.120.

Simeon, I. M, Herkendell, K., Pant, D., & Freitag, R. (2022). Electrochemical evaluation of different polymer binders for the production of carbon-modified stainless-steel electrodes for sustainable power generation using a soil microbial fuel cell. Chemical Engineering Journal Advances, 10, Article 100246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceja.2022.100246.

Yu, B., Feng, L., He, Y., Yang, L., & Xun, Y. (2021). Effects of anode materials on the performance and anode microbial community of soil microbial fuel cell. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 401, Article 123394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123394.

Sahari, S. K., Rosli, M. Z. F, Butit, A. M., Kipli, K., Anyi, M., Awang, A., Sawai, M., Mahmood, M. R., Hasanah, Lilik., Kram,

A. R., Embong, Z., & Nahrawi, H. (2022). Fabrication of Single Chamber Microbial Fuel Cell (SMFC) Using Soil as a Substrate. Science & Technology, 30(2), 1103-1114. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjst.30.2.14

Guo1, W., Li, X., Cui, L., Li, Y., Zhang, H., & Ni, T. (2022). Promoting the anode performance of microbial fuel cells with nano‑molybdenum disulfide/carbon nanotubes composite catalyst. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, 45, 159-170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-021-02649-w.

Mirabootalebi, S. O. (2020). A new method for preparing buckypaper by pressing a mixture of multi-walled carbon nanotubes and amorphous carbon. Advanced Composites and Hybrid Materials, 3, 336-343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-020-00167-z

Her, S. C., & Hsu, W. C. (2022). Temperature Sensitivities Along with Mechanical Properties of CNT Buckypaper Sensors.

Sensors 2020, 20, Article 3067. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20113067

Wang, H. Z., Huang, Z. P., Cai, Q. J., Kulkarni, K., Chen, C-L., Carnahan, D., & Ren, Z. F. (2010). Reversible transformation of hydrophobicity and hydrophilicity of aligned carbon nanotube arrays and buckypapers by dry processes, Carbon, 48(3), 868- 875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2009.10.041.

Azimi, M., & Asselin, E. (2022). Improving Surface Functionality, Hydrophilicity, and Interfacial Adhesion Properties of High- Density Polyethylene with Activated Peroxides. ACS Applied Material & Interfaces, 14, 3601-3609. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c23703.

Park, J. G., Smithyman, J., Lin, C-Y., Cooke, A., Kismarahardja, A. W., Li, S., Liang, R., Brooks, J. S., Zhang, C., & Wang, B. (2009). Effects of surfactants and alignment on the physical properties of single-walled carbon nanotube buckypaper. Journal of Applied Physics, 106, Article 104310. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3255901.

Hirose, S., Trang, N. D., & Taguchi, K. (2023). Soil microbial fuel cells with low-cost anode made of rice husk charcoal and Japanese drawing ink “Bokuju”, International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics, 71(S1), S413-S420. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAE-220189.

Authors

Soichiro Hirose
[email protected] (Primary Contact)
Trang Nakamoto
Kozo Taguchi
Hirose, S., Nakamoto, T., & Taguchi, K. (2023). Soil Microbial Fuel Cell with Hydrophilic Treated Buckypaper Anodes. Resourceedings, 3(2), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.21625/resourceedings.v3i2.998

Article Details

Received 2023-08-13
Accepted 2023-09-28
Published 2023-09-30

Most read articles by the same author(s)