Historical Places and Identity of the Cities: Khuzam Palace Museum, Jeddah

Marwa Abouhassan

Place identity refers to a cluster of ideas about identity and place in the fields of geography, urban planning, urban design, landscape architecture, and environmental psychology. Place identity has become a significant issue in the last 25 years in urban planning and design. Place identity concerns the meaning and significance of places for their inhabitants and users, and how these meanings contribute to individuals' conceptualizations of self. Place identity also relates to the context of mogdernity, history, and the politics of representation (Proshansky et al., 1995).

Jeddah went through dramatic changes in the last 70 years after demolishing the old city wall and oil booming, which affected the identity, traditions, and lifestyle (Shiber, 1967). In order to eliminate the lack of city identity and change the people's attachment to Jeddah's new urban development, this paper will take Khuzam Palace Museum as a case study to express the relationship between the past and present in the city. The paper will have an analytical review of urban memory, place identity, and place attachment elements. At the end, the paper will set some recommendations to consider using and respecting the community memories from the past that related physical elements and social interaction that have to express into new forms of place-making in the future development to increase the identity and the sense of belonging in Jeddah city.

Keywords

Historical Places; Cultural Identity; Urban Conservation; Khuzam Palace

References

Al-Naim, M. (2008). Identity in transitional context: open-ended local architecture in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR, 2(2), 125-146.

Altman, I., & Low, S. M. (Eds.). (2012). Place attachment (Vol. 12). Springer Science & Business Media.

Bott, S., Cantrill, J. G., & Myers Jr, O. E. (2003). Place and the promise of conservation psychology. Human Ecology Review, 100-112.

Cheshmehzangi, A., & Heat, T. (2012). Urban identities: Influences on socio-environmental values and spatial inter-relations. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 36, 253-264.

Cohen, A. P. (1994). Culture, identity and the concept of boundary. Revista de antropologia social, (3), 49-62.

Cuddihy, K. (2001). An A to Z of places and things Saudi. Stacey International.

Montgomery, J. (1998). Making a city: Urbanity, vitality and urban design. Journal of urban design, 3(1), 93-116.

Proshansky, H. M., Fabian, A. K., & Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self. Journal of environmental psychology.

Relph, E. (1976). Place and placelessness. London: Pion.

Roberts, P., & Sykes, H. (Eds.). (2000). Urban regeneration: a handbook. SAGE Publications Ltd.

Sandercock, L. (1998). Towards Cosmopolis: Planning for multicultural cities. New York: J. Wiley & Sons.

Shamsuddin, S., & Ujang, N. (2008). Making places: The role of attachment in creating the sense of place for traditional streets in Malaysia. Habitat International, 32(3), 399-409.

Shiber, S. G. (1967). Report on City Growth in the Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia. SG Shiber, Recent Arab City Growth, Kuwait.

Smaldone, D., Harris, C., & Sanyal, N. (2005). An exploration of place as a process: The case of Jackson Hole, WY. Journal of environmental psychology, 25(4), 397-414.

Stedman, R. C. (2003). Is it really just a social construction?: The contribution of the physical environment to sense of place. Society &Natural Resources, 16(8), 671-685.

Williams, D., Anderson, B., Mc Donald, C., & Patterson, M. (2002). Measuring place attachment: More preliminary results. Paper presented at Leisure Research Symposium, NRPA Congress, and San Antonio.

Copyright (c) 2020 Resourceedings Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.