“L’homme qui recherche l’harmonie a le sens du sacré”. In this way Le Corbusier claims the main difference between holiness and spirituality. In the omitted comparison, it is clear that the Architect's main interest is to highlight the strong laical and spiritual character of which is harmonious both in Nature and Architecture. Thanks to this approach, the democratic reception of the spiritual feeling overcomes the sacred one which remains linked to semantics stratifications that still require interpretation. In order to develop a democratic vision to community life, Le Corbusier entrusts the rules of a daily living, with the contingent possibilities of a community such as the Dominican one and also with the need to individual seclusion, celebrating immanence and silence. “Loger dans le silence des hommes de prière et d’étude et leur construire une église”.
The celebration of both prayer and community life is what Le Corbusier wants to achieve, without distracting attention from the main purpose of the spiritual and individual growth, that nourishes the utopian function of this project. This shares a common research with the other architectures conceived for a community life such as l’Unité d’Habitation or the Swiss Pavilion. This is the way the liturgical spaces welcome daily life evaluating un homme de 24 heures, arranging an hermeneutical relationship between places for gathering and meditation. From this we can acknowledge that architecture of the Le Corbusier’s Convent, allows holy inspirational feelings among liturgical and environmental spaces. All this is due to an hard intellectual work based on humanism, far from faith, but open to spiritual values and mystical feelings which place Beauty as an existential motivation for a religious work, including human dimension and the answers to his needs.
Bachelard, G. (1950), De la nature du rationalisme, Bulletin de la Société française de philosophie n°1950 44 2.
Belaud, P. (1961a). Perché Le Corbusier, in Un convento di Le Corbusier, edited by Jean Petit, Edizioni di Comunità, Milano, p.18.
Belaud, P. (1961b), Pourquoi Le Corbusier?, in Un couvent de Le Corbusier, Forces Vives, Paris, 17-18.
Casali, V. (2001a). Conversazione con André Wogenscky, in Le Corbusier, il programma liturgico, a cura di G. e G. Gresleri, Editrice Compositori Bologna, p.149-154
Casali, V. (2001b). Santa Maria de La Tourette e il “Convento Radioso”, in Le Corbusier il programma liturgico, edited by Giuliano Gresleri, Glauco Gresleri, Editrice Compositori, Bologna, pp.122,146.
Couturier, P. (1953a). “Le Corbusier, Ronchamp”, in L’Art Sacré nn,11-17
Couturier, P. (1984b) La vérité blessée, Paris, Plon.
Gresleri, G. (2001). La chiesa Prolongement de l’habitat, in Le Corbusier, il programma liturgico, edited by G. e G. Gresleri, Editrice Compositori Bologna, 8-13.
Gresleri, G., Gresleri, G. (2001). Le Corbusier. Il programma liturgico, Editrice Compositori, Bologna, p. 20
Gresleri, G., Oubrerie, J. (1984). Le Corbusier, Viaggio in Oriente, Venezia: Marsilio, p. 127.
Petit J. (1961) Un convento di Le Corbusier. Milano: Edizione di Comunità.
Rogers, E.N. (1960) Architetti laici per le chiese, Casabella 238.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution: other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
With the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher's final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher's request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author's own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- The Work is the Author's original work;
- The Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- The Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- The Work has not previously been published;
- The Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- The Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author's breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 7 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher's use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.