Assessment Heliopolis Heritage Suburb Against Sustainable Conservation

Mohamed Farid, Osama Abdelhady
There is a complete assessment of approaches regarding conservation in the modern heritage suburbs field. As we know that the modern heritage conservation as cultural heritage to a limited degree has been accepted inside a known structure and discipline, and inside hypothesis, the preservation legislation inconsistency has been critically evaluated. The conservation scope is seen restricted to the old and historical, and hence it renders latest heritage not worth of any such conservation. In many countries like Egypt this is seen valid. Regardless of confined elucidations of current and advanced heritage which is able to foresee the mono typing, the cultural suggestions and “product of the past” state are denied especially of the 20th century.
There is degradation in the expanding and transforming features of cultural heritage which is immovable. In Egypt, as such, the latest or modern heritage undergoes inadequate analysis and is generally featured inside the cultural heritage framework. The buildings and their conservation started from the 20th century inside the predilection of Ministry of Heritage and Culture. As no such criteria are determined for such preference, there is a gradual loss in the buildings which symbolize the modern heritage regardless of their unique style and structure in relation to other infrastructure which is considered for conservation. The conservation of modern heritage is rendered with the threat of being torn down or destroyed due to aging functionally and physically inside the cultural heritage framework. This also includes the legal context updating on the basis of recent and modern parameters, essential and vital. The buildings which are not only the modern heritage products, but also the important and vital sources of the city’s history, as well as architecture needed to be sustained and hence Egyptian history and the process of rapid modernization, is becoming more and more important. It is through an impact of Cairo (the capital city) on urban identity. In short, the aim of this paper is to focus on the Heliopolis heritage suburbs and the related studies on the current sustenance of suburbs of modern heritage. Moreover, the approach to conserve heritage suburbs is assessed in this paper, which was developed at first in Cairo in the nineteenth century and the beginning of 20th century. Heliopolis heritage suburbs are given particular importance here in this paper.

References

Abu-Lughod, J. L. (1978, April). Preserving the living heritage of Islamic cities. In Aga Khan Award for Architecture, Proceedings of Seminar One. Aga Khan Award for Architecture/Concept Media Singapore.

Alhowaily, A. (2014). Scientific Proposal GERLS Calls. Berlin.

Kayın, E. (2007). Preservation and evaluation of the architectural heritage of the Republican era. Archiecture, 334, 16- 17.

El-Aref, N. (2014, April 24). Protecting architectural heritage. Al-Ahram Weekly. Retrieved from http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/News/6040.aspx

Heliopolis Company for Housing & Construction. The Past and the Present and the Future. (2006).

Ilbert, R. (1985): Heliopolis: Colonial Enterprise and Town Planning Success. In A. Evin (Eds.) The Expanding Metropolis: Coping with the Urban Growth of Cairo. Singapore: Concept Media/Aga Khan Award for Architecture.

Stovel, H. (2007). Effective use of authenticity and integrity as world heritage qualifying conditions. City & Time, 2(3), 21-36.

Strange, I. (1997). Planning for change, conserving the past: towards sustainable development policy in historic cities?. Cities, 14(4), 227-233.

Strunk, W., & White, E. B. (1979). The elements of style(3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.

Volait, M. (2003). Making Cairo Modern (1870-1950): Multiple Models for a ‘European-Style Urbanism. England: Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Academy

Copyright (c) 2018 Resourceedings