Land Tenure Security and Resident’s Stability in Squatter Settlements of Lahore

Sana Malik (1), Ruhizal Roosli (2), Fariha Tariq (3), Muhammad Salman (4)
(1) PhD Scholar (Housing), School of Housing, Building & Planning, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia, Malaysia,
(2) Senior Lecturer, School of Housing, Building & Planning, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia, Malaysia,
(3) Chairperson Department of City & Regional Planning, School of Architecture and Planning, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan, Pakistan,
(4) Lecturer, Department of Architecture, University of South Asia, Lahore, Pakistan, Pakistan


Squatters have now become integral part of urban centers in most developing countries like Pakistan, with Lahore experiencing growth of such informal settlements at its peak. A myriad of issues and challenges associated with economic, social, spatial, environmental and political contexts within squatters has become a great hindrance towards home improvement and better life style. Tenure security brings a sense of homeownership to socioeconomically disadvantaged households. Recently, promotion of increased security of tenure of all whether living in formal or informal settlements has been affirmed by New Urban Agenda of Habitat III. Therefore, it is need of the time to look into present tenure types of squatters being offered by the city to solve problem of housing backlog and to provide promote inclusivity ensuring healthy, affordable and sustainable environment for all inhabitants.
Proposed argument has got stronger foundation due to comparative analysis of squatter having secured land tenure with squatter of unsecure tenure. In this paper we explore that tenure security is one of the key factors which leads to resident’s stability, through case study approach by investigating two squatters based on their tenure types. The data collected through questionnaire will help us to identify other key factors associated with resident stability in squatters. Study reveals that limited secured tenure options and poor governance in present urban scenario projects as major obstacles in coping with urban sprawl and squatter settlements. Findings help us to understand the phenomena of inter-connection of land tenure security and residential stability of squatters in Lahore, suffering from housing shortage and informal settlements.

Full text article

Generated from XML file


Adams, M., Sibanda, S., & S. Turner. (1999). Land Tenure Reform and Rural Livelihoods in Southern

Africa. Natural Resource Perspectives, No. 39. Overseas Development Institute, London.

Centre for Micro Finance (IFMR). (2007). A Report on Low Income Housing in India: Challenges and

Opportunities for Microfinance. Chennai: Institute for Financial Management and Research.

Doebelej, W. A. (1987). The Evolution of Concepts of Urban Land Tenure in Developing Countries. Habitat International,11,(1), 7-22.

Durand-Lasserve, A., & Royston, L. (2002). Holding Their Ground: Secure Land Tenure for the Urban

Poor in Developing Countries. London: Earthscan Publications.

Durand-Lasserve, A., & Selod, H. (2009). The Formalization of Urban Land Tenure in Developing Coun

tries. In Urban Land Markets (pp. 101-132). Dordrecht: Springer.

Haider, E. A. (2015). A Hard Day’s Night – Field notes on land ownership and poverty in urban Punjab.

Social Science and Policy Bulletin VOLUME 6 No. 3, pp. 2-9.

Handzic, K. (2010). Is legalized land tenure necessary in slum upgrading? Learning from Rio’s land tenure policies in the Favela Bairro Program. Habitat International,34(1), 11-17.

Hardoy, J., & Satterthwaite D. (1993), ‘Housing policies: a review of changing government attitudes and

responses to city housing problems in the Third World’, in G. Shabeer Cheema (ed.), Urban Management:

Policies and Innovations in Developing Countries, Westport, CT, Praeger, 111–61

Hasan, A. (1992). SEVEN REPORTS ON HOUSING:Government Policies and Informal Sector and Community Responses. Karachi: Orangi Pilot Project Research and Training Institute for the Development of Katchi Abadis.

Hasan, A., Ahmed, N., Raza, M., Sadiq, A., Ahmed, S. U., & Sarwar, M. B. (2013, March). Land ownership, control and contestation in Karachi and implications for low-income housing. London: International

Institute for Environment and Development (IIED).

Lahore Population 2016. (2016, November 11). Retrieved from World Population Review:

Maxwell, D., &Wiebe, K. (1999) ‘Land tenure and food security: exploring dynamic linkages’. Development and Change, Vol. 30, No. 4. , 825–849.

Nasreen, Z., & Hira, A. (2009, October). Impact Evaluation of Katchi Abadis Regularization and Development Programme (Case Study Lahore, Pakistan). Lahore, Pakistan.

Nyametso, J. K. (2010, October). Improvement Of Squatter Settlements: The Link Between Tenure Security, Access To Housing, And Improved Living And Environmental Conditions. Dunedin UNEDIN, NewZealand.

Qadeer, M. A. (1983). Lahore Urban Development in the Third World. Lahore : Allied Press

Qadeer, M. A. (1996). An Assessment of Pakistan’s Urban Policies, 1947–1997. The Pakistan Development Review, 443—465.

Reale, A., & Handmer, J. (2011). Land tenure, disasters and vulnerability. Disasters, Vol. 35, No. 1. ,


Sengupta, U., & Sharma, S. (2006). The challenge of squatter settlements in Kathmandu: Addressing a

policy vacuum. International Planing Development Review, 105-126.

Shami, M., & Majid, H. (2015). The Political Economy of Public Goods Provision in Slums: Preliminary

results from a field study in urban Pakistan. Social Science and Policy Bulletin, VOLUME 6 No. 3, pp.


UN-HABITAT. (2008). Housing Finance Mechanisms In India. Nairobi : UN-HABITAT, United Nations

Human Settlements Programme 2008.

Urban Unit. (n.d.). Assessment of Land Development and Management Practices in Five. Lahore: Urban Unit. Retrieved from


Sana Malik
[email protected] (Primary Contact)
Ruhizal Roosli
Fariha Tariq
Muhammad Salman
Malik, S., Roosli, R., Tariq, F., & Salman, M. (2019). Land Tenure Security and Resident’s Stability in Squatter Settlements of Lahore. ARCHive-SR, 3(2), 146–159.

Article Details