Multi-Dimensional Assessment Method of Open Spaces in New Communities' Low- Middle Income Housing

Mennatallah Tawfik, Sara Ali
Rapid urbanization is considered today as complex combinations of what we have at the present and the shift that will happen in the future with many other social and economic forces. The mid-20th century and contemporary urban development create the new expanded urban areas that have the characteristics of fragmented integration cores to-wards the emergence of new centralities. The new built environment should have an intelligible special configuration to adapt with human agents, and based on this insight, it is important to explore these prop-ositions further and examine different ways to investigate the domain of urban spaces in new communities and its related social properties as urban spaces shouldn’t compiling one dimensional demand. This paper introduces some examples of open spaces in new commu-nities low -middle income housing that could be used to investigate in which manner, spatial patterns can influence the social contribution, and analyzing the social factors which have an impact on the physical properties of the open spaces in these segregated urban pattern. The aim from this paper is to reach a multi-dimensional assessment meth-od that could recover the open spaces s that suffered from the absence of policies and regulations of urban planning and development. The study is introducing a methodology for empirically exploring and clas-sifying the variables and attributes that define the physical and non-physical dimensions in open spaces by qualitative case study analysis to facilitate the social cohesion and integration in the community. By comparing the results from the spatial and physical perspective; an assessment method will be reached at the end to for-mulate the new community potentials and to overcome the problems for more social integration.

References

Hafez, R. (2015)," New cities between sustainability and real estate investment: A case study of New Cairo city ". HBRC Journal. Re-treived from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hbrcj.2015.03.001.

Harrison and Dourish, (1996), “Re-Placing Space: The Roles of Place and Space in Collaborative Systems”, Rank Xerox Research Centre. Cambridge Lab (EuroPARC). Retrieved from http://www.cc.gatech.edu/~keith/classes/ubicomplexity/pdfs/crit/harrison-place-space.pdf .

Ashihara, Yoshainbou, (1981), “Exterior Design in Architecture”, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, USA, Page: 25.

Carmona, M. (2003). Public Places- Urban Spaces (1st ed.). New York: Architectural Press.

Carmona, M., Tiesdell, T. H., & Oc, T. (2010). Public Places- Urban Spaces: The Dimensions of Urban Design (2nd ed.). New York: Architectural Press.

GEHL, J, (2006), New city life, Copenhagen, Danish Architectural Press.

GEHL, J” Cities for People”, (2010), island press, Washington l Covelo l London, page 21.

Hillier, B. and Hanson, J. (1984) The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Lynch, K., (1984), Good City Form, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

El-Hiusseiny .and Kessiba, (2012), “Challenges of Social Sustainability in Neo-liberal Cairo: Re- questioning the role of public space” , in ASIA Pacific International Conference on Environment-Behaviour Studies, Mercure Le Sphinx Cairo Hotel, Giza, Egypt, 31 October 2 November, pp.739-749.

GEHL ARCHITECTS APS, (2002), “Public Spaces and public life. city of Adelaide”, Available at: http://www.adelaidecitycouncil.com [accessed December 6 2016].

Tadamun. (2015) “Egypt’s New Cities: Neither Just nor Efficient”, Retrieved December 3, 2016, from http://www.tadamun.info/2015/12/31/egypts-new-cities-neither-just-efficient/?lang=en#.WEshHKJ97_Q .

Copyright (c) 2018 Resourceedings