Lost Wax Casting: From 3D Printing to Functional Parts
Abstract
The lost wax production process is an intermediate step in converting a design idea that has been 3D printed from Polylactic Acid (PLA) plastic into a functional part via metal casting processes. This work offers an experimental assessment of the benefits accompanied by the lost-wax method, from both energy and economic-related aspects. The methodology of this work is represented by a sequence of steps that involve converting a 3D modeled and printed part (an investment casting tree), into a metal part, which in this case is made out of Aluminum. Aluminum was obtained from recycled products (i.e., beverage cans). The first couple of steps revolve around obtaining a 3D printed part of the desired 3D model, that can be created using a multitude of readily available Computer Aided Design (CAD) software. The 3D printed part is then utilized to create a plaster mold, which is followed by a firing step to get rid of the temporal 3D printed part to leave room for the casting metal. An energy assessment was carried out to compare the lost wax method and conventional machining (i.e., computer numerical control (CNC) machining). It was shown that to obtain the exact same functional part using the lost wax method, 12.124 kWh of energy is required, versus that of 17.297 kWh for CNC machining. Moreover, normalized costs of 0.067$/g and 0.096$/g were attributed to the lost wax and CNC machining, respectively, showing an almost 70% reduction in price when opting for the lost wax method.
Full text article
References
Alasad, S., Hasan, R., Haider, W., & Alami, A. H. (2022). Design and manufacture of functional components from recycled aluminum using lost PLA method. 2022 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences, ASET 2022, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ASET53988.2022.9735093
Aziz, M. N. A., Rusnaldy, Munyensanga, P., Widyanto, S. A., & Paryanto. (2018). Application of lost wax casting for manufacturing of orthopedic screw: a review. Procedia CIRP, 78, 149–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROCIR.2018.08.304
Claisse, P. A. (2016). Alloys and nonferrous metals. In Civil Engineering Materials (pp. 361–368). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100275-9.00032-2
Czarnecka-Komorowska, D., Grześkowiak, K., Popielarski, P., Barczewski, M., Gawdzińska, K., & Popławski, M. (2020). Polyethylene wax modified by organoclay bentonite used in the lost-wax casting process: processing− structure− property relationships. Materials, 13(10), 2255.
Hawaldar, N., & Zhang, J. (2018). A comparative study of fabrication of sand casting mold using additive manufacturing and conventional process. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 97(1–4), 1037–1045. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00170-018-2020-Z/METRICS
Hegab, H., Khanna, N., Monib, N., & Salem, A. (2023). Design for sustainable additive manufacturing: A review. Sustainable Materials and Technologies, 35, e00576. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2023.e00576
Kazakova, E., & Lee, J. (2022). Sustainable Manufacturing for a Circular Economy. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(24), 17010. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142417010
Khaledi, A. A., Farzin, M., Akhlaghian, M., Pardis, S., & Mir, N. (2020). Evaluation of the marginal fit of metal copings fabricated by using 3 different CAD-CAM techniques: Milling, stereolithography, and 3D wax printer. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 124(1), 81–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROSDENT.2019.09.002
Mamadjanovich, A., Sardorbek, M., Yusupov, M., & Sadirov, S. (2021). ADVANTAGES AND THE FUTURE OF CNC MACHINES. Scientific Progress, 2(1), 2021. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/advantages-and-the-future-of-cnc-machines
Michalik, P., Zajac, J., Duplák, J., & Pivovarnik, A. (2012). CAM software products for creation of programs for CNC machining. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 141 LNEE(VOL. 1), 421–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27311-7_56/COVER
Munoz, S., Ramos, V., & Dickinson, D. P. (2017). Comparison of margin discrepancy of complete gold crowns fabricated using printed, milled, and conventional hand-waxed patterns. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 118(1), 89–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROSDENT.2016.09.018
Salonitis, K., & Ball, P. (2013). Energy efficient manufacturing from machine tools to manufacturing systems. Procedia CIRP, 634–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2013.06.045
Swift, K. G., & Booker, J. D. (2003). Casting processes. Process Selection, 35–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-075065437-1/50005-6
Wang, J., Sama, S. R., Lynch, P. C., & Manogharan, G. (2019). Design and topology optimization of 3D-printed wax patterns for rapid investment casting. Procedia Manufacturing, 34, 683–694.
Yang, J., & Li, H. (2022). Accuracy of CAD-CAM milling versus conventional lost-wax casting for single metal copings: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROSDENT.2022.05.018
Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution: other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
With the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher's final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher's request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author's own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- The Work is the Author's original work;
- The Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- The Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- The Work has not previously been published;
- The Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- The Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author's breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 7 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher's use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Article Details
Accepted 2023-12-22
Published 2023-12-31