Informal settlements are often not included in the development plan of cities. Urban planning has increasingly been less concerned about provision of basic infrastructure and services to vulnerable communities living and working in informal conditions. Increasing official apathy pose major challenges to achieving the globally accepted goal of inclusive urbanization as envisaged in Sustainable Development Goals / SDGs.. Goal 11 that aims at creating Safe, resilient, inclusive and sustainable cities will remain distant until we factor in the informal living and working conditions into our current urban planning narrative.
GazdharBandh is a Notified Slum by Slum Redevelopment Authority (SRA) of MMRDA (Maharashtra Metropolitan Region Development Authority). The slum pocket is located in western suburb of Santacruz west, Mumbai. Gazdhar Bandh shows high density informal housing within the “no development zone” as per the development plan 2034, in estuary conditions that is vulnerable to recurrent floods.
Slum upgradation faces multiple challenges with the complex interplay of local diversities, relocation and livelihood concerns. Using the case study of Gazdar Bandh slum, we examine how community responses to housing and other design strategies like public spaces, streetscapes, and makeshift spaces as immediate responses can go a long way to build long term resilience and factored into the broader city level planning narrative. The findings broadly examine the question: How can urban planning and design embrace uncertainty and concludes with an operational framework drawing on participatory planning and good urban place engaging multiple stakeholders.
Agrawal, A. (2008). The role of local institutions in adaptation to climate change.
Bartlett, S. (2008). Climate change and urban children: impacts and implications for adaptation in low-and middle-income countries. Environment and Urbanization, 20(2), 501-519.
Caldeira, T. P. (2017). Peripheral urbanization: Autoconstruction, transversal logics, and politics in cities of the global south. Environment and Planning D. Society and Space,35(1), 3-20.
Chatterjee, M. (2010). Slum dwellers response to flooding events in the megacities of India. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change,15(4), 337-353.
Chakrabarty, A. (2016). Of slime moulds and smart slums — Kolkata informal settlements and the tale of a failed canal reclamation project. Environment and Urbanization,28(2), 553–568.
Hallegatte, S., Henriet, F., Patwardhan, A., Narayanan, K., Ghosh, S., Karmakar, S., ... & Herweijer, C.
(2010). Flood risks, climate change impacts and adaptation benefits in Mumbai: an initial assessment of
socio-economic consequences of present and climate change induced flood risks and of possible adaptation options. OECD Environment Working Papers, (27), 0 1.
Kelly, P. M., & Adger, W. N. (2000). Theory and practice in assessing vulnerability to climate change and
Facilitating adaptation. Climatic change,47(4), 325-352.
Lau, S. S. Y. (2011). The Dogma of Hong Kong Urbanism. Journal of Asian Urbanism,4(3), 20–21.
Mahadevia, D. (2001). Sustainable urban development in India: an inclusive perspective. Development in Practice, 11(2-3), 242-259.
MoHUA Launched LAP and TPS for 25 Smart Cities. Elets News Network http://smartcity.eletsonline.
com doi. http://smartcity.eletsonline.com/mohua-launched-lap-and-tps-for-25-smart-cities/ accessed on 20 August 2018
Pacoine, M. (2006). City Profile Mumbai. Cities,23(3), 229–238.
Roy, A. (2009). Why India cannot plan its cities: Informality, insurgence and the idiom of urbanization.
Planning theory,8(1), 76-87.
Revi, A. (2008). Climate change risk: an adaptation and mitigation agenda for Indian cities. Environment and urbanization,20(1), 207-229.
Stecko, S., & Barber, N. (2007). Exposing vulnerabilities: Monsoon floods in Mumbai, India. Unpublished case study prepared for Global Report on Human Settlements.