Public Space Privatization: A Catalyst for Urban Spaces Gentrification
Abstract
The initiatives adopted by the government to enhance the urban areas and quality of life may catalyze the gentrification phenomenon, which results in significant changes in the economic and demographic activities within a public space, and the replacement of one societal group with another. Involving the private sector in the development processes is one of the strategies the government proposed to satisfy the population’s needs and demands for leisure urban facilities. While initially encouraging diversity, privatization of public spaces eventually manifests as a form of segregation that excludes a particular socioeconomic group, affecting the publicness, accessibility, and usability of these spaces. This paper aims to uncover how privatization of public spaces contributes to the gentrification of the public space itself by proposing a model to measure the level of publicness and gentrification of the public spaces. A comprehensive literature review was conducted to identify the common variables of gentrification and privatization, followed by an analysis of international case studies using these variables to test the model. The results revealed that privatization is a silent gentrifying force that first transforms the public space before influencing the surrounding urban areas.
Full text article
References
Aalbers, M.B. (2019), Introduction to the Forum: From Third to Fifth-Wave Gentrification. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 110(1), pp. 1–11
Amin, A. (2008). Collective culture and urban public space. City, 12(1), 5-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810801933495
Akkar, Z. M. (2005a). Questioning the ‘publicness’ of public spaces in postindustrial cities. Traditional Dwellings and Settlements Review, 16, 75–91.
Akkar, M. (2005b). The changing ‘publicness’ of contemporary public spaces: a case study of the Grey's Monument Area, Newcastle upon Tyne. Urban Design International, 10, 95–113.
Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Benn, S., & Gaus, G. (1983). Public and Private in Social Life. London: Croom Helm. CABE (2007). Spaceshaper. A user's guide. London. www.webarchive.nationalarchives. gov.uk (Accessed 2016.05.30)
Bell, D. (1973). The coming of post-industrial society: A venture in social forecasting. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Brouillette, S. (2009). LITERATURE AND GENTRIFICATION ON BRICK LANE. Criticism, 51(3), 425–449. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23131523
Carr, S. (1992). Public space. Cambridge University Press.
Clark, E. (2010a). On blindness, centrepieces and complementarity in gentrification theory. In L. Lees, T. Slater, & E. Wyly (Eds.), The gentrification reader (pp. 251-255). Routledge.
Clark, E. (2010b). The order and simplicity of gentrification. In L. Lees, T. Slater, & E. Wyly (Eds.), The gentrification reader (pp. 24-29). Routledge.
Dijkstra, Lewis. (1999). Public Spaces: A Comparative Discussion of the Criteria for Public Space. Research in Urban Sociology. 5. 1-22. 10.1016/S1047-0042(00)80019-7.
Eldaidamony M. and Shetawy A. (2016). Gentrification Indicators in the Historic City of Cairo. Conservation of Architectural Heritage (pp. 107-118). Luxor: Elsevier.
Erten, O. T. (2011). Questioning the Privatization of Public Space: the" Publicness" of Shopping Centers. Izmir Institute of Technology (Turkey).
Glass, R. (1964) 'Introduction: Aspects of change', in Centre for Urban Studies (ed.) London: Aspects of Change (London: MacKibbon and Kee)
Grant, B. (2003). Urban gentrification is associated with the movement "PBS Documentaries with a point of view: What is Gentrification?". Public Broadcasting Service.
Gant, A. C. (2016). Holiday rentals: The new gentrification battlefront. Sociological Research Online, 21(3), 112-120. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.4071
Gonzalez, S., & Waley, P. (2013). Traditional retail markets: The new gentrification frontier? Antipode, 45(4), 965-983. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2012.01040.x
Geniş, Ş. (2007). Producing elite localities: The rise of gated communities in Istanbul. Urban Studies, 44(4), 771-798. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980601185684
Glasze, Georg & Pütz, Robert & Rolfes, Manfred (2005). Die Verräumlichung von (Un-)Sicherheit, Kriminalität und Sicherheitspolitiken, in: G. Glasze, R.
Hackworth, J. & N. Smith (2001), The Changing State of Gentrification. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 92, pp. 464–477
Harvey, D. (2008). The Right to the City. New Left Review, 53, 23-40.
Kennedy, M., & Leonard, P. (2001). Dealing with neighborhood change: A primer on gentrification and policy choices (Discussion Paper). The Brookings Institution Center on Urban & Metropolitan Policy; PolicyLink.
Ley, D. (1978). Social geography and the taken-for-granted world. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 3(4), 498–512. https://doi.org/10.2307/622047
Low, S. M., & Smith, N. (Eds.). (2006). The politics of public space. Routledge
Low, S. M. (2006). The erosion of public space and the public realm: Paranoia, surveillance, and privatization in New York City. City & Society, 18(1), 43-49. https://doi.org/10.1525/city.2006.18.1.43
Lefebvre, H. (1968). Le droit à la ville. Anthropos.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell. (Original work published 1974)
Mantey, D. (2017). The ‘publicness’ of suburban gathering places: The example of Podkowa Leśna (Warsaw urban region, Poland). Cities, 60, 1-12.
Mitchell, D. (2003). The Right to the City: Social Justice and the Fight for Public Space. New York, NY: The Guilford Press
Marcuse, P. (2009). From critical urban theory to the right to the city. City: Analysis of Urban Change, Theory, Action, 13(2-3), 185-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810902982177
Németh, J., & Schmidt, S. (2011). The privatization of public space: Modeling and measuring publicness. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 38(1), 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1068/b36057
Rosen, G., & Razin, E. (2009). The rise of gated communities in Israel: Reflections on changing urban governance in a neoliberal era. Urban Studies, 46(8), 1703-1723. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009105508
Brouillette, S. (2009). Literature and Gentrification on Brick Lane. Criticism 51(3), 425-449. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/crt.0.0114.
Sorkin, M. (Ed.). (1992). Variations on a theme park: The new American city and the end of public space. New York, NY: Hill and Wang
Sassen, S. (2017). Embedded borderings: Making new geographies of centrality. Territory, Politics, Governance. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2017.1290546
S.W.H. Wang, Commercial gentrification and entrepreneurial governance in Shanghai: A case study of Taikang road creative cluster, Urban Pol. Res. 29 (4) (2011) 363–380, https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2011.598226.
Sýkora, L. (1993). City in transition: The role of rent gaps in Prague’s revitalization. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 84(4), 281–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.1993.tb01623.x
Smith, N. (1979). Toward a theory of gentrification: A back to the city movement by capital, not people. Journal of the American Planning Association, 45(4), 538–548.
Smith, A. (2020). Sustaining municipal parks in an era of neoliberal austerity: The contested commercialisation of Gunnersbury Park. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 53(4), 704–722. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X20951814
Varna, G., & Tiesdell, S. (2010). Assessing the publicness of public space: The star model of publicness. Journal of urban design, 15(4), 575-598.
Wolch, J. R., Byrne, J., & Newell, J. P. (2014). Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities “just green enough.” Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 234-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017.
Walks, R. A., & Maaranen, R. (2008). The timing, patterning, and forms of community gentrification and neighbourhood change in Montreal, Toronto, and Vancouver, 1961 to 2001 (Research Paper No. 211). Centre for Urban and Community Studies, University of Toronto.
Zuk, M., Bierbaum, A. H., Chapple, K., Gorska, K., & Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (2018). Gentrification, displacement, and the role of public investment. Journal of Planning Literature, 33(1), 31-44.
Chudy, E. (2016, January 4). Go Ape Battersea Park gallery. My London. https://www.mylondon.news/whats-on/find-things-to-do/gallery/go-ape-battersea-park-gallery-10683398.
Battersea Park: Enable Leisure and Culture. (n.d.). https://enablelc.org/parks/battersea-park/
Edwards, L. (2015, February 20). London Formula E track revealed for two races in Battersea Park. Pocket-lint. https://www.pocket-lint.com/cars/news/132843-london-formula-e-track-revealed-for-two-races-in-battersea-park/
Wignall, K. (2021, June 1). History in Gunnersbury Park. Look Up London Tours. https://lookup.london/history-in-gunnersbury-park/
Visit Gunnersbury Park – Regular events & activities for adults and children of all ages – The Chiswick Calendar. (2021, February 25). The Chiswick Calendar. https://chiswickcalendar.co.uk/gunnersbury-park/
Ross, D. (2024, July 2). Greenwich Park | History, photos & historic attractions. Britain Express. https://www.britainexpress.com/London/greenwich-park.html.
Hymas, C. (n.d.). London 2012 Olympics equestrian test event at Greenwich Park in pictures. The Telegraph. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/olympics/picturegalleries/8615897/London-2012-Olympics-equestrian-test-event-at-Greenwich-Park-in-pictures.html
Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution: other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
With the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher's final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher's request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author's own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- The Work is the Author's original work;
- The Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- The Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- The Work has not previously been published;
- The Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- The Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author's breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 7 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher's use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Article Details
Accepted 2026-01-13
Published 2026-01-31